design a software system , a device or website that can help to decrease the wait time in the EMR

Question

Prepare a PowerPoint presentation of 10-15 slides that covers all major sections of your final capstone project paper.Describe a health care barrier or issue that needs to be addressed.
include all of the components written to date (incorporating revisions), as well as the remaining sections. These sections include:
Title Page
Introduction
Problem or Issue
Proposed Solution
Implementation Plan
Timeline
Evaluation Plan
Dissemination Plan
Conclusion/Summary
Reference Page
Appendices (i.e., Literature Evaluation Table)
Describe your proposed solution and how the proposed solution will resolve a barrier or issue in health care.
Justify major organizational resources that may be needed to accomplish changes.
Identify strategies to create a clear vision for internal and external stakeholders.
Identify stakeholders with expertise to create effective work groups or collaborators.
Discuss the expected outcomes for you initiating your proposal.

The PowerPoint presentation should cover all major sections referenced in your Benchmark-Final Capstone Project Paper. In addition, include a slide that summarizes plans for disseminating evidence. Include the following:

Professional organizations, conferences, journals, or employers you would present your findings to.
One professional publication or conference in your dissemination plan and explain why you chose this professional venue over others.
Include slide notes in which you annotate the explanation of the information in each slide.

Refer to the resource, "Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations," provided in the study materials, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.


Rubric

Content Sections From the Benchmark Capstone Project Paper
37.5 points


Dissemination Plan for Professional Organizations, Conferences, Journals, or Employers
7.5 points
Criteria Description
Dissemination Plan for Professional Organizations, Conferences, Journals, or Employers

5. Excellent
7.5 points
The description of the dissemination plan for professional organizations, conferences, journals, or employers is thorough.

4. Good
6.38 points
The description of the dissemination plan for professional organizations, conferences, journals, or employers is detailed.

3. Satifactory
5.63 points
The description of the dissemination plan for professional organizations, conferences, journals, or employers is present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory
4.88 points
The description of the dissemination plan for professional organizations, conferences, journals, or employers is present but lacks detail or evidence.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The description of the dissemination plan for professional organizations, conferences, journals, or employers is not present.


Justification of Dissemination Plan for Professional Publication or Conference
7.5 points
Criteria Description
Justification of Dissemination Plan for Professional Publication or Conference

5. Excellent
7.5 points
The justification of dissemination plan for a professional publication or conference is thorough.

4. Good
6.38 points
The justification of dissemination plan for a professional publication or conference is detailed.

3. Satifactory
5.63 points
The justification of dissemination plan for a professional publication or conference is present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory
4.88 points
The justification of dissemination plan for a professional publication or conference is present but lacks detail or evidence.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The justification of dissemination plan for a professional publication or conference is not present.


Dissemination Plan for Career Readiness
7.5 points
Criteria Description
Dissemination Plan for Career Readiness

5. Excellent
7.5 points
The explanation of dissemination plan for career readiness is thorough.

4. Good
6.38 points
The explanation of dissemination plan for career readiness is detailed.

3. Satifactory
5.63 points
The explanation of dissemination plan for career readiness is present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory
4.88 points
The explanation of dissemination plan for career readiness is present but lacks detail or evidence.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The explanation of dissemination plan for career readiness is not present.


Presentation of Content
45 points
Criteria Description
Presentation of Content

5. Excellent
45 points
The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea. Persuasive, authoritative information from at least the minimum required number of reliable, credible sources is included.

4. Good
38.25 points
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Persuasive information is included from the minimum required number of reliable sources.

3. Satifactory
33.75 points
The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other. Some persuasive information from the minimum required number of reliable sources is included.

2. Less Than Satisfactory
29.25 points
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Some persuasive information from reliable sources is included. Some persuasive information is included, but the minimum required number of sources may not be met, and information may be unreliable or lack credibility.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information is unclear. Little or no persuasive information from reliable sources is included.


Layout
15 points
Criteria Description
Layout

5. Excellent
15 points
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

4. Good
12.75 points
The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

3. Satifactory
11.25 points
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.

2. Less Than Satisfactory
9.75 points
The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.


Language Use and Audience Awareness
15 points
Criteria Description
Includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.

5. Excellent
15 points
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

4. Good
12.75 points
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

3. Satifactory
11.25 points
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

2. Less Than Satisfactory
9.75 points
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.


Mechanics of Writing
7.5 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use.

5. Excellent
7.5 points
Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good
6.38 points
Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

3. Satifactory
5.63 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.

2. Less Than Satisfactory
4.88 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.


Documentation of Sources
7.5 points
Criteria Description
Citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.

5. Excellent
7.5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good
6.38 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Satifactory
5.63 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory
4.88 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.