Terry v. Ohio
THIS IS A RE-WRITE BECAUSE THE TEACHER ONLY GAVE ME 152/250. I DIDN[‘T SITE A SOURCE EVEN THOUGH I GOT THE INFORMATION FROM MY INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF U.S. LAW BY ROBERT H. KLONOFF, WEST ACADEMIC PUBLISHING 2016. (PAGES 563 TO 573)
MY TEACHER TOLD ME THAT: your writing could improve with stronger verbs and less ARE IS AND: you really missed the distinction between probable cause and reasonable articulable suspicion– this case is about creating an exception to probable cause. TRY again in the REWRITES
After reviewing Terry v. Ohio on pages 563 to 573, answer the following questions:
Was the search of Terry appropriate? Why or why not?
Was the State allowed to use the gun seized from Terry as evidence at trial?
Why did Justice Douglas disagree with the majority? Be specific!
Using the Terry decision as the basis for your answer, what legitimate reasons might an officer have to search someone even in the absence of probable cause to make an arrest?
The written assignment should be two to three pages with the following formatting requirements:
12 point font
1″ margins
Double spaced
Correct Bluebook citations
